Since my last topic had a serious Otaku lean, I guess I'll continue the theme with another subject I've been milling about my head since I first began to realize it. My realization was that anime and manga have become something bigger than I ever realized it could be. But what really surprises me is how many people in the art world, normally of the higher authority, or at least with some experience, have such ill will towards it. Of course I disagree with their choice to feel that way, however, is it really a surprise to have an art teacher tell you that anime isn't art? Or to have the tripfags at /ic/ shun it's every form?
The truth is, anime fans never were the aces at communicating that this style was and is important, and most of what gets over here isn't the most intelligent and refined pieces. Instead, we have images of Pokemon, Naruto, and Bleach come to mind when anime is mentioned. However, I feel it's just too late in the game for us to think of these anymore. We've already shown that even if anime and manga doesn't communicate a thick, heavy subject all of the time, it is something that has sold very, very well. Art conventions, sad to say, have nothing on a weeaboo-infested anime convention.
But that's where I divide the blame. If this is a form of interesting visuals to support a product(s), then this would be very similar to graphic design, which we know is considered art. If it is too simple, then I question the ever notorious modern art as to why we allow such simplicities top over another. If it is because it is stylized, then I'm not sure why we consider the art from the past art at all, then, as their people were not accurately depicted either.
But I see where the discrimination comes from. it stems not from the hatred of the style but a hatred of the people and popularity it brings. Everyone wants to make their own manga, but no one wants to be a painter? That's what this style and industry has done to many young people, and therefore frustrating those who study old masters every day only to be shunned by those who barely practice. It's common, however, for those who don't study art to feel the title of being art means the piece must be good, at least prestigious. This is not true. Art is simply a classification, a small label indicating that this was meant to express and if it did not or did so badly is what really matters. Some feel insulted calling anime and manga art simply because they feel that gives it a seat in a sacred place right next to Dante and a girl swinging. If someone truly thinks like this, then that's just sad.
However, I seem to be putting off anime-styled artwork as simple dashes of desu and kawaii, but that is not always true. There is an unfathomable amount of anime influenced artwork out there on the internet alone, and some of it is very good and has more of a sense of individuality than the common artist might think. The problem is, it isn't imported and showcased nearly enough to really give people a full grasp as to what so many people into this style of art is a good thing. Young people finally have a gateway into studying the basics, and an interest in art that wasn't there before. A teacher can't be picky; sometimes their going to draw their conceptual pieces right next to their anatomy studies. And sometimes that's okay. The creativity and enjoyment that this style encourages is great, because after you've got good ideas, all you have to do is learn the technical skills. When this person is ready to take on a career in art, they may just learn this is the style that will earn them the most cash...so why would they do anything else?
Now, I know there are times when the style just isn't appropriate. That's where the anime fans of yesterday went wrong, and where the fans of tomorrow will hopefully do right. This is a style that's evolved and diversified so much in Japan, and it's a shame someone who should be an expert in art isn't aware of that in the US.
Anyway, please comment and let me know what you think!
